Considering the fact that there will not seem like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can several of you supply a starting point with this mixture and issues to consider when Operating this Load up?

They are the identical matter, but H4831 sc is cut shorter so it's going to pack into a situation simpler then the normal, and in some instances like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us so as to add more powder then just the normal H4831.

Can they be interchanged without having concerns other then applying normal load techniques when switching from lot to great deal?

With all the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me very good teams and great velocity, but Rottweil R905 incorporates a appreciably bigger velocity and provides marginally much better accuracy. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos inside the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave fantastic precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally improved. Therefore, in Each and every of such scenarios I went with another powder, but I would definitely dislike to divest myself in the H4831.

The sole variation as I understand it would be that the SC was built to function by way of powder steps far better (which it does). The extended grains never feed perfectly in any respect in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:

I've applied H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem with no distinction. The only thing may be the small Slash provides you with somewhat more Place. Fantastic luck!gun)

I don't love to work h4831sc load data up a load working with a single number of powder then have to operate up once again for the reason that I run out and possess to get started on employing a new great deal variety.

Anyhow, I desired to give some 7828SC a try to lessen many of the compression. What a blunder, h4831sc I couldn't get this powder to shoot properly or make the velocities I get with regular 7828.

Any load data to assist that? My 1st assumed is it is not intending to burn every one of the way and velocities will be sluggish and far and wide. Could be a nice fireworks Exhibit!

locutus said: I nevertheless have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows as a result of my powder measures efficiently.

Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or frequent) and lot that you are employing although. Similar burn amount doesn't mean it will eventually behave "just" exactly the same. I have noticed about 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

Right after looking through this text (and several Many others, but this a person is easily the most data pushed with many accredited shooters) I have stopped worrying about touching or becoming inside a magical distance from your lands, and started loading exactly where I could optimize multiple components of a load. Just my .02, with any luck h4831sc load data , you can obtain anything to work for ya.

Some of the aged Lyman data just stated IMR 4831, which was surplus armed service powder and now newer mfg as H4831.

Needless to say, sitting down all-around for twenty+ many years (I realize a guy who continues to be using the H4831 he bought in the 60s), means that melt away fees will most likely transform a smidge, and new manufacture things will probably be a bit unique as well.